I want to say a heartfelt THANK YOU to everyone who has supported my podcast here on Locals and elsewhere. Thanks to you all, it appears we are indirectly headed to the Supreme Court. The federal government has just filed a motion to stay in Missouri v Biden, a landmark speech case - and a key plaintiff in the case is Dr. Aaron Kheriaty, who cites my 2021 censored interview with him as a Constitutional right's violation. It was the video that prompted my bosses at the Washington state Department of Natural Resources to demand I stop interviewing anyone who undermined their vaccine mandate - which led to my termination as I refused to comply. (Thanks to Matt Taibbi for linking to my videos in his article, cited below.) The next step, if I understand correctly, is SCOTUS. I had no idea at the time that a simple hour of my life could possibly turn into what it has. I interviewed Dr. Kheriaty just like anybody else who has been on, with my little 1-year old producer helping behind the scenes. Just goes to show, "Better is a little with righteousness than great revenues with injustice. The heart of man plans his way, but the Lord establishes his steps." (Proverbs 16:8-9)
MOTION TO STAY:
https://nclalegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/23A243.pdf
TAIBBI'S ARTICLE:
https://www.racket.news/p/on-missouri-v-biden-and-the-new-abnormal
Reporter told AFTER the discussion, to make messages "off the record".
Reporter publishes 'unsolicited' texts from Trump's handpicked prosecutor about Letitia James case - YouTube
YouTube is baiting us video creators, in the name of "protecting" us... They already know who we are, especially us in the YouTube Partner Program (YPP). All of us in the YPP, they're paying us money, sending us tax documents to our physical address annually. They totally know who we are. But, now they want us to do this. Also, they ALREADY have a tool that finds if someone uses our video in one we didn't create. And allow us to make copyright takedown requests. But with so-called artificial intelligence. Our "likeness" may be misused. I'll pass on "submitting" for now. Unless enough of my viewers find I am being put into videos in an AI kind of way. They sometimes find things YouTube didn't notice. But, YouTube already has enough data to simply ask us if they want to check for misuse of our "likeness". Without the additional hoops. It's conditioning, for the Digital ID agenda.
Sneak Peek: Likeness Detection - YouTube